missing twin towers chart card

"[...] Other beliefs are like gateways opening wide vistas for exploration [...]"

 —Sophia Lyon Fahs

Welcome to the eighth step of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's progressive demonstration of the twin towers' demolition.

The demonstration uses a well-honed version of the scientific method:

This exercise in observation and reason is offered by engineering professionals, but people with average mental abilities and a modest education can sustain it. As such, the mass media and the major scientific and technical outfits could have effortlessly published it. Yet they have not.

The U.S. government operates under the scrutiny of numerous highly variegated watchdogs, many of whom would ostensibly benefit from denouncing any 9/11 foul play. Yet very few of them have brought this information to the public's attention.

Kindly note that this page does not prove the twin towers' demolition, the impossibility of the official "aircraft and fire" theory, the fraudulent nature of the latest U.S. technical report on this matter, or the global and persisting cross-disciplinary censorship thereof. It merely contributes to this proof.

This page concludes the search for and review of the major physical evidence that might have disproved from a technical standpoint the theory of the twin towers' controlled demolition. Since this evidence did not disprove this theory, this and the preceding seven pages have established the technical plausibility of the twin towers' demolition.

AE911Truth's next chosen step is to look for some specific process that would have been used in the now technically plausible demolition.

Accordingly, whenever you are comfortable with the above conclusions, consider pursuing AE911Truth's exploration of the twin towers' destruction by wondering whether it melted steel in large quantities. Or click on a specific box or phrase in the block-diagram on top of this page to visit some other aspect of it. Or return to its epistemological question.