missing twin towers chart card

"[...] Some beliefs weaken a person's selfhood. They blight the growth of resourcefulness [...]"

 —Sophia Lyon Fahs

Welcome to the ninth step of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's progressive demonstration of the twin towers' demolition.

The preceding first to eighth steps have established the technical plausibility of the twin towers' explosive controlled demolition starting in the zone of earlier terror attacks. This ninth step wonders whether the demolition engineers would have locally melted their steel structure.

The demonstration uses a well-honed version of the scientific method:

This exercise in observation and reason is offered by engineering professionals, but people with average mental abilities and a modest education can sustain it. As such, the mass media and the major scientific and technical outfits could have effortlessly published it. Yet they have not.

The U.S. government operates under the scrutiny of numerous highly variegated watchdogs, many of whom would ostensibly benefit from denouncing any 9/11 foul play. Yet very few of them have brought this information to the public's attention.

Kindly note that this page does not prove the twin towers' demolition, the impossibility of the official "aircraft and fire" theory, the fraudulent nature of the latest U.S. technical report on this matter, or the global and persisting cross-disciplinary censorship thereof. It merely contributes to this proof.

AE911Truth's next logical step is to look for some specific process that would have been used to melt the twin towers' steel structure.

Accordingly, whenever you are comfortable with this page's conclusions, consider pursuing AE911Truth's exploration of the twin towers' destruction by wondering whether their steel structure was melted with thermite. Or click on a specific box or phrase in the block-diagram on top of this page to visit some other aspect of it. Or return to its epistemological question.