"[...] Other beliefs are bonds in a world community, where sincere differences beautify the pattern [...]"

 —Sophia Lyon Fahs

Welcome to the sixth step of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's progressive demonstration of the twin towers' demolition.

The demonstration uses a well-honed version of the scientific method:

• AE911Truth has formulated the hypothesis that the twin towers were demolished, explosively and starting in the zone of earlier terror attacks
• AE911Truth has brainstormed the technically recognizable consequences of this hypothesis and grouped them into eight criteria
• the sixth criterion has established that if the twin towers were demolished, then their destruction would violently eject large pieces of structural steel and these pieces would inflict considerable damage on nearby buildings
  • conversely, a finding that the twin towers' destruction did not violently eject large pieces of structural steel or that these pieces did not inflict considerable damage on nearby buildings would undermine the plausibility of their demolition
• if, on the contrary, the twin towers' destruction was due, per the official theory, to the high speed impact of large aircraft and the ensuing fires, even assuming that such fires could cause catastrophic structural damage, then their destruction would not violently eject large pieces of structural steel
  • conversely, a finding that the twin towers' destruction did violently eject large pieces of structural steel would undermine the plausibility of this official theory
• you are welcome to explore the segment of AE911Truth's online slide show that discusses this particular question, starting here
  • for more detailed information, you may want to review AE911Truth's "Blueprint for Truth" DVD, where AE911Truth's founder and CEO Richard Gage, AIA, presents and comments on the slide show
• the slides in question happen to yield objective evidence suggesting that the twin towers' destruction did indeed violently eject large pieces of structural steel and that these pieces did indeed inflict considerable damage on nearby buildings
• this evidence:
  • undermines the plausibility of the official theory that blames the twin towers' destruction on the high speed impact of large aircraft and the ensuing fires
  • challenges the latest U.S. technical report that supports this official theory to credibly account for it
  • meets the above-mentioned sixth criterion of the twin towers' demolition

This exercise in observation and reason is offered by engineering professionals, but people with average mental abilities and a modest education can sustain it. As such, the mass media and the major scientific and technical outfits could have effortlessly published it. Yet they have not.

The U.S. government operates under the scrutiny of numerous highly variegated watchdogs, many of whom would ostensibly benefit from denouncing any 9/11 foul play. Yet very few of them have brought this information to the public's attention.

Kindly note that this page does not prove the twin towers' demolition, the impossibility of the official "aircraft and fire" theory, the fraudulent nature of the latest U.S. technical report on this matter, or the global and persisting cross-disciplinary censorship thereof. It merely contributes to this proof.

Accordingly, whenever you are comfortable with this page's conclusions, consider pursuing AE911Truth's exploration of the twin towers' destruction by wondering whether it yielded explosions. Or click on a specific box or phrase in the block-diagram on top of this page to visit some other aspect of it. Or return to its epistemological question.