Welcome to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's evaluation of the U.S. technical reports that blame the twin towers' destruction on the high speed impact of large aircraft and the ensuing fires.

The findings of our review of the major physical evidence related to the twin towers' destruction can be fairly summarized as follows:

• the technical plausibility of the twin towers' controlled demolition
• the use of large quantities of thermate and of nanothermite in this technically plausible demolition
• the technical implausibility of the official theory that blames the twin towers' destruction on the high speed impact of large aircraft and the ensuing fires, even assuming that such fires could cause catastrophic structural damage, which they couldn't anyway
• a number of important challenges to the latest U.S. technical report that supports this official "aircraft and fire" theory
• reasons to believe that this report is a fraud
• the simplicity, importance and availability of this information
• the mass media and the major scientific and technical outfits' very disturbing failure to spontaneously bring this information to the public's attention
• the alarming failure by most of the numerous highly variegated watchdogs who ostensibly scrutinize U.S. activities for signs of foul play to pick up this slack

Now is the time to examine other aspects of the apparently fraudulent U.S. report and the technical investigations that led to it.

Our examination uses a well-honed version of the scientific method:

• if our findings above are indeed correct, then the latest U.S. technical report that supports the "aircraft and fire" theory will not contain objective evidence that conflicts with them
  • accordingly, a finding that this report does not provide objective evidence that undermines the demolition theory and does not provide objective evidence incompatible with the use of large quantities of thermate and nanothermite would confirm our findings above
  • conversely, a finding that this report does contain objective evidence that undermines the demolition theory or does provide objective evidence incompatible with the use of large quantities of thermate and nanothermite would undermine our findings above
• you are welcome to explore the segment of AE911Truth's online slide show that discusses this particular question, starting here
  • for more detailed information, you may want to review AE911Truth's "Blueprint for Truth" DVD, where AE911Truth's founder and CEO Richard Gage, AIA, presents and comments on the slide show
• the slides in question happen to yield still further objective evidence:
  • supporting the twin towers' controlled demolition
  • supporting the use of thermite in their demolition
  • against the official theory that blames their destruction on the high speed impact of large aircraft and the ensuing fire
  • of fraud in the latest U.S. technical report that supports this official theory:
    • the report dismisses the overarching question of the twin towers' destruction
    • the report falsifies essential information

Incidentally, other sections of AE911Truth's slide show happen to expose further fraud in the latest U.S. technical report on the twin towers:

• the review of Building 7's own latest U.S. technical report has produced one instance of fraud applicable to the twin towers: the U.S. government's deliberate destruction of most of the twin towers' forensic evidence
• the upcoming review of whistle blowing will detail one instance of falsification, as the results of experiments that would undermine the report were arbitrarily replaced with completely different and unsupported data

This page closes the technical review of the twin towers' destruction. It essentially confirms our findings above and turns them into tentative conclusions.

AE911Truth's next logical steps are to check the existence of anecdotal evidence that corroborates these tentative conclusions, starting with that which the freshly completed technical investigation happened to uncover.

Accordingly, whenever you are comfortable with this page's conclusions, consider pursuing AE911Truth's exploration of the twin towers' destruction by recalling the previously reviewed testimonies of first responders. Or click on a specific box or phrase in the block-diagram on top of this page to visit some other aspect of it. Or return to its epistemological question.