
Welcome to
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's evaluation of the U.S. technical reports
that blame
the twin towers' destruction on the high speed impact of large aircraft and the
ensuing fires.
The findings of our
review of the major physical
evidence related to the twin towers' destruction can be fairly summarized as
follows:
- the technical plausibility of the twin towers'
controlled demolition
- the use of large quantities of thermate and of
nanothermite in this technically plausible demolition
- the technical implausibility of the official theory that
blames the twin towers' destruction on the high speed impact of large aircraft
and the ensuing fires,
even assuming that such fires could cause
catastrophic structural damage, which they couldn't
anyway
- a number of important challenges to the latest
U.S. technical report that supports this official "aircraft and fire" theory
- reasons to believe that this report is
a fraud
- the simplicity, importance and availability
of this information
- the mass media and the major scientific and technical outfits'
very disturbing failure to spontaneously bring
this information to the public's attention
- the alarming failure by most of the numerous
highly variegated watchdogs who ostensibly scrutinize U.S. activities for signs of foul play to
pick up this slack
Now is the time to examine other aspects of the apparently fraudulent
U.S. report and
the technical investigations that led to it.
Our examination uses a well-honed version of the
scientific method:
- if
our findings above are indeed correct,
then the latest U.S. technical report that
supports the "aircraft and fire" theory will not
contain objective evidence that conflicts with them
- accordingly, a finding that this report does not
provide objective evidence that undermines the demolition theory
and does not provide objective evidence incompatible with the use of
large quantities of thermate and nanothermite would confirm
our findings above
- conversely, a finding that this report does
contain objective evidence that undermines the demolition theory
or does provide objective evidence incompatible with the use of
large quantities of thermate and nanothermite would undermine
our findings above
- you are welcome to
explore the segment of AE911Truth's online slide show that discusses this particular
question, starting
here
- for more detailed information, you may want to
review AE911Truth's "Blueprint for Truth" DVD, where AE911Truth's founder and
CEO Richard Gage, AIA, presents and comments on the slide show
- the slides in question happen to yield still further objective evidence:
- supporting the twin towers' controlled
demolition
- supporting the use of thermite
in their demolition
- against the official
theory that blames their destruction on the high speed impact of large
aircraft and the ensuing fire
- of fraud in the latest U.S. technical
report that supports this official theory:
-
the report
dismisses the overarching
question of the twin towers' destruction
-
the report
falsifies essential information
Incidentally, other sections of AE911Truth's slide show happen to expose further fraud in
the latest U.S. technical report on the twin towers:
- the review of Building 7's own latest U.S. technical report
has produced one instance of fraud applicable to
the twin towers: the U.S. government's deliberate destruction of most of the twin towers' forensic evidence
- the upcoming review of whistle
blowing will detail one instance of
falsification, as the results of experiments that would undermine the
report were arbitrarily replaced with completely different and unsupported
data
This page closes the technical review of the twin towers'
destruction. It essentially
confirms our findings above and turns them into
tentative conclusions.
AE911Truth's next logical steps are to check the existence of anecdotal evidence
that
corroborates these tentative conclusions, starting with that which the freshly
completed technical investigation happened to uncover.
Accordingly, whenever you are comfortable with this page's conclusions,
consider pursuing AE911Truth's exploration of the twin towers' destruction by recalling the previously reviewed testimonies of first responders.
Or click on a specific box or phrase in the
block-diagram on top of this page to visit some
other aspect of it. Or
return to its
epistemological
question.