The Twin Towers Set 9/11's Epistemological Question

Do you know that the U.S. government hid—rather clumsily—Building 7’s controlled demolition? Are you aware of the global and enduring censorship imposed by the mass media and the major scientific and engineering outfits over this cover-up? Would you like to probe it deeper? If so, read on. If not, consider finding reasons to come back here, perhaps by visiting this overview of Building 7's censorship.

As much as the controlled demolition of a high-rise, even as large as Building 7, does not deserve much worry, its cover-up by the U.S. government is very disturbing. Since this cover-up has been sloppy by any standard, its ensuing de facto near-absolute censorship by the mass media and the major scientific and engineering outfits is outright alarming.

While there are many ways to tackle this epistemological plot, the most straightforward path is to review an event similar in nature, place, time and magnitude to Building 7’s demolition but dramatically different for its highly emotional connotation and the considerable paradigm shift it has led the human community into: the twin towers’ destruction. This exercise is best left to the de facto authority on the twin towers, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). It so happens that AE911Truth has established that the twin towers, like Building 7, were destroyed by a controlled demolition, albeit with two notable technical deviations from the regular process:

Behold the synthetic diagram of AE911Truth's analysis. For your convenience, clicking on a specific box or phrase takes you to a summary of the reasoning behind it or to the relevant part of AE911Truth's slide show.

missing twin towers chart card

Within the scope of this overview, suffice to note the use of a well-honed version of the scientific method:

The above review of AE911Truth's exploration of the twin towers' destruction yields the following findings:

They immediately vindicate 9/11 Truth:

They also shift a major paradigm in the areas of global terrorism and counterterrorism:

But the juiciest conclusions, like on Building 7, are epistemological:

This leads us to your next 9/11 action items:

AE911Truth’s analysis of the twin towers’ explosive demolition frames the censorship of Building 7's implosive demolition and of its U.S. cover-up within a still much larger and still much more mysterious context. Far from putting to rest its epistemological plot, it expands it into the baffling question as to how literally tens of thousands of watchdogs of extremely varied types and affinities would somehow conspire worldwide to continuously censor the cover and protection the U.S. government granted the most formidable terrorists in history.

This is precisely 9/11's fundamental teaching:

As such, the specifics of 9/11 matter much less than the mind-boggling epistemological questions they raise:

The discerning reader will concur that it is hard to imagine more pressing questions than these. They turn the 9/11 censorship into an overarching call to relentless investigation. Accordingly, whenever you have completed this page's action items and are comfortable with its conclusions, consider an excursion into an analysis of the 9/11 censorship, its ramifications, and the surprisingly highly favorable paradigm shift they portend.

Love,

Daniel Noël, 2011-July-20