The Twin Towers Set 9/11's Epistemological Question
Do you know that the U.S. government hid—rather clumsily—Building 7’s
controlled demolition? Are you aware of the global and enduring censorship imposed by the mass media
and the major scientific and engineering outfits over this cover-up? Would you like to probe it deeper? If so, read on. If not,
consider finding reasons to come back here, perhaps by visiting this
overview
of Building 7's censorship.
As much as the controlled demolition of a high-rise, even as large as Building 7, does
not deserve much worry, its cover-up by the U.S. government is
very disturbing. Since this cover-up has been sloppy by any standard, its ensuing de facto
near-absolute censorship by the mass media and the major scientific and
engineering outfits is outright alarming.
While there are many ways to tackle this epistemological plot, the
most straightforward path is to review an event similar in nature, place, time and magnitude to
Building 7’s demolition but dramatically different for its highly emotional connotation
and the considerable paradigm shift it has led the human community into:
the twin towers’ destruction. This exercise is best left to
the de facto authority on the twin towers, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
(AE911Truth). It so happens that AE911Truth has established that the twin towers, like Building 7, were destroyed by
a controlled demolition, albeit with two
notable technical deviations from the regular process:
the demolitions were explosive (versus implosive in the case of Building 7),
as they
violently projected members of their steel frames away from the twin towers
they started high in the towers, in the zone of the earlier terror
attacks (allegedly by large hijacked passenger jets), versus at the base in
the case of Building 7
Behold the synthetic diagram of AE911Truth's analysis. For your convenience,
clicking on a specific box or phrase takes you
to a summary of the reasoning behind it or to the relevant part of AE911Truth's
slide show.
Within the scope of this overview, suffice to note the use of a well-honed
version of the
scientific method:
AE911Truth formulates the hypothesis that
the twin towers were demolished explosively and starting in the zone of
earlier terror attacks
AE911Truth brainstorms the major
recognizable consequences of this hypothesis,
starting with “if the twin towers were
demolished, then their destruction would have started suddenly and in the zone of the earlier terror attacks”
AE911Truth reformulates these expected symptoms into as many possible
reasons to doubt the
demolition hypothesis, starting
with “a finding that the twin towers' destruction did not start suddenly or
did not start in the zone of the earlier terror attacks will undermine the
technical plausibility of the
plausibility of their controlled demolition”
AE911Truth also reformulates them into as many
possible reasons to doubt the official theory that
blames the twin towers' destruction on the high speed impact of large aircraft
and the ensuing fires, starting with "a finding that the twin towers'
destruction did start suddenly would undermine the plausibility of this
official theory"
AE911Truth explores in turn each of these possible reasons to
doubt
either theory
these explorations happen to consistently yield objective evidence
that:
supports the twin towers' controlled
demolition
undermines the official theory
hints at fraud in the latest U.S. technical report that supports this official theory
people with average mental abilities and minimal education
can sustain
The above review of AE911Truth's exploration of the twin towers'
destruction yields the following findings:
on the day of 9/11, in the World Trade Center, the twin towers experienced
sudden, total, catastrophic, disintegrative, structural failures
they were due to a dual, well executed, controlled demolition
these were by far the largest controlled demolitions
ever
these controlled demolitions deviated from standard demolitions by being explosive
and starting in the zone of earlier terror attacks
the U.S. government investigated these events from a technical standpoint
this investigation was an obvious fraud and a mediocre cover-up
the demonstration of the above is offered by engineering professionals,
but people with average mental abilities and minimal education
can sustain it
there has been a global, persisting and
cross-disciplinary conspiracy to censor this
They immediately vindicate 9/11 Truth:
the twin towers’ destruction was, by far, 9/11’s defining event
the official 9/11 explanation for the twin towers’ destruction is a fraud
consequently, the official 9/11 narrative is essentially a fraud
9/11 qualifies as a false flag
operation:
a calamity took place (the unforeseen destruction of the twin towers
before their complete evacuation)
a powerful entity (the U.S. government) knowingly concocted a false
account of it (blaming it on the high speed impact of large aircraft and the
ensuing fires)
that entity used the calamity and the false account to promote and
conduct policies (open-ended war and others) that would otherwise be
unpalatable
They also shift a major paradigm in the
areas of global terrorism and counterterrorism:
the twin towers’ unexpected, swift and complete disintegration was 9/11’s flagship event, with cameras
rolling, 2,000+ civilians inside, shock and awe
the twin towers' demolition before the completion of their
evacuation was definitely the work of terrorists: it
was deliberate, it was a surprise, and it killed many civilians who were
generally not involved in specific political or military activities
the demolition of the twin towers is the most formidable terror attack
in
history: it was morbidly spectacular, it wielded much gratuitous death and
destruction, and it generated great fear worldwide
the individuals who planned and executed the demolition of the twin towers
while they were still being evacuated are the most formidable terrorists in history
the U.S. government gave cover and protection
to the most formidable terrorists in history
the U.S. government’s solemn commitment to fight terror is
a grand lie
But the juiciest conclusions, like on Building 7, are epistemological:
the twin towers' terrorist demolition and its U.S. cover-up are
fairly easy to understand, under the guidance of AE911Truth
or some similar outfit
therefore, the numerous leaders and organizations (watchdogs) who ostensibly
constantly look for any U.S. faux pas and fight tooth and nail
the policies
inspired by 9/11 could have dug
AE911Truth’s information on their own, drawn
AE911Truth’s
conclusions, and brought these conclusions to the public’s attention, presumably
shortly after 9/11
had they done so, they could have slain the proverbial dragon
and nullified the
many 9/11-induced policies that they claim to oppose
however, virtually none of these watchdogs has
done so, perhaps not even those you know
or like best
even in 2011, with the above widely known, the watchdogs
still largely ignore—at best—9/11 Truth
this brings us to 9/11’s fundamental teaching: the enduring,
global and cross-disciplinary censorship of the
cover and protection the U.S. government granted the most formidable terrorists in history
This leads us to your next 9/11 action items:
list your sources of information: TV channels, government agencies, religious
outfits, political parties, charities, labor unions, advocacy groups, your employer, etc.
evaluate whether they should but did not properly report on 9/11
politely engage those who did not:
ask them
why they failed to inform you and others of 9/11’s true nature
if you’d like,
forward them a link to an undisbelievable introduction to 9/11 such as
the 9/11 baby step
invite them to respond to the accusations that introduction or this page
formulates against them
consider sending them money at the same time so as to
give them an additional incentive to answer you
conclude that they could be active participants in the 9/11 censorship
accordingly reevaluate your confidence in the information they provide on topics other than 9/11
look for other sources of information and organizations that have
openly opposed
policies that 9/11 inspired or favored:
evaluate if they could have made their
members or followers' work easier by denouncing the cover-up of the twin
towers' terrorist demolitions
repeat the above exercise on them
accordingly
consider alerting their members and followers
look for sources of information and organizations that have
lost clout
due to 9/11 or the policies 9/11 inspired or favored:
wonder if they could
have made their members or followers' work easier by denouncing the cover-up
of the twin towers' terrorist demolitions
repeat the above exercise on them
accordingly consider alerting their members and followers
look for sources of information that have duly reported
on the cover and protection
the U.S. government granted the most formidable terrorists ever
review these alternative sources of information and accordingly give them
more
credibility
rely on these sources if you wish to inform yourself on other aspects of
9/11
mistrust leaders who claim to
be knowledgeable about 9/11 but are
uncomfortable with this page
AE911Truth’s analysis of the twin towers’ explosive demolition frames the
censorship of Building 7's implosive demolition and of its
U.S. cover-up within a still much larger and still much more mysterious context.
Far from putting to rest
its epistemological
plot, it expands it into the baffling question as to how literally
tens of thousands of watchdogs of extremely varied types and affinities would
somehow conspire worldwide to continuously censor the cover and protection the U.S. government granted
the most formidable terrorists in history.
This is precisely 9/11's fundamental teaching:
the morbidly spectacular controlled
demolitions of the twin towers have served as the pretext
for many nefarious
activities, first among them an open-ended war
they and their cover-up are
evident
yet no watchdog of importance has voiced concern over this
his hints
at a censorship of gargantuan proportions:
it is amazingly resilient
it cuts across traditional intra-human boundaries: geographic, religious, economic, political, linguistic, etc.
it implicates leaders and organizations whose vested interests or stated missions would have
them vociferously denounce the fraud of 9/11
it is evil, as it has allowed the 9/11 conspirators to impose a decade of worldwide misery and promises another one
As such, the specifics of 9/11 matter much less than the
mind-boggling epistemological questions they raise:
how has the 9/11 censorship been coordinated?
how was it designed and built under the nose of
“us the people of the world?”
has it been used to cover other grand conspiracies
against "us?"
has it been used to cover smaller conspiracies also?
what processes does it use to prevent and fix leaks?
can “we” gather information about it at all?
can “we” find its root cause?
could the discovery of its root cause provide “us” with some
benefit, perhaps
commensurate with the immense evil the 9/11-induced calamities have inflicted on “us?"
if so, what would “our” best course of corrective action
be?
The discerning reader will concur that it is hard to imagine more pressing
questions than these. They turn the 9/11 censorship into an
overarching call to relentless
investigation. Accordingly, whenever you have completed this page's action items
and are comfortable with its conclusions, consider an excursion into an analysis of the 9/11 censorship, its
ramifications, and the surprisingly highly favorable paradigm shift they
portend.
