The Twin Towers Set 9/11's Epistemological Question

Do you know that the U.S. government hid—rather clumsily—Building 7’s controlled demolition? Are you aware of the global and enduring censorship imposed by the mass media and the major scientific and engineering outfits over this cover-up? Would you like to probe it deeper? If so, read on. If not, consider finding reasons to come back here, perhaps by visiting this overview of Building 7's censorship.

As much as the controlled demolition of a high-rise, even as large as Building 7, does not deserve much worry, its cover-up by the U.S. government is very disturbing. Since this cover-up has been sloppy by any standard, its ensuing de facto near-absolute censorship by the mass media and the major scientific and engineering outfits is outright alarming.

While there are many ways to tackle this epistemological plot, the most straightforward path is to review an event similar in nature, place, time and magnitude to Building 7’s demolition but dramatically different for its highly emotional connotation and the considerable paradigm shift it has led the human community into: the twin towers’ destruction. This exercise is best left to the de facto authority on the twin towers, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). It so happens that AE911Truth has established that the twin towers, like Building 7, were destroyed by a controlled demolition, albeit with two notable technical deviations from the regular process:

• the demolitions were explosive (versus implosive in the case of Building 7), as they violently projected members of their steel frames away from the twin towers
• they started high in the towers, in the zone of the earlier terror attacks (allegedly by large hijacked passenger jets), versus at the base in the case of Building 7

Behold the synthetic diagram of AE911Truth's analysis. For your convenience, clicking on a specific box or phrase takes you to a summary of the reasoning behind it or to the relevant part of AE911Truth's slide show.

Within the scope of this overview, suffice to note the use of a well-honed version of the scientific method:

• AE911Truth formulates the hypothesis that the twin towers were demolished explosively and starting in the zone of earlier terror attacks
• AE911Truth brainstorms the major recognizable consequences of this hypothesis, starting with “if the twin towers were demolished, then their destruction would have started suddenly and in the zone of the earlier terror attacks”
• AE911Truth reformulates these expected symptoms into as many possible reasons to doubt the demolition hypothesis, starting with “a finding that the twin towers' destruction did not start suddenly or did not start in the zone of the earlier terror attacks will undermine the technical plausibility of the plausibility of their controlled demolition”
• AE911Truth also reformulates them into as many possible reasons to doubt the official theory that blames the twin towers' destruction on the high speed impact of large aircraft and the ensuing fires, starting with "a finding that the twin towers' destruction did start suddenly would undermine the plausibility of this official theory"
• AE911Truth explores in turn each of these possible reasons to doubt either theory
• these explorations happen to consistently yield objective evidence that:
  • supports the twin towers' controlled demolition
  • undermines the official theory
  • hints at fraud in the latest U.S. technical report that supports this official theory
  • people with average mental abilities and minimal education can sustain

The above review of AE911Truth's exploration of the twin towers' destruction yields the following findings:

• on the day of 9/11, in the World Trade Center, the twin towers experienced sudden, total, catastrophic, disintegrative, structural failures
• they were due to a dual, well executed, controlled demolition
• these were by far the largest controlled demolitions ever
• these controlled demolitions deviated from standard demolitions by being explosive and starting in the zone of earlier terror attacks
• the U.S. government investigated these events from a technical standpoint
• this investigation was an obvious fraud and a mediocre cover-up
• the demonstration of the above is offered by engineering professionals, but people with average mental abilities and minimal education can sustain it
• there has been a global, persisting and cross-disciplinary conspiracy to censor this

They immediately vindicate 9/11 Truth:

• the twin towers’ destruction was, by far, 9/11’s defining event
• the official 9/11 explanation for the twin towers’ destruction is a fraud
• consequently, the official 9/11 narrative is essentially a fraud
• 9/11 qualifies as a false flag operation:
  • a calamity took place (the unforeseen destruction of the twin towers before their complete evacuation)
  • a powerful entity (the U.S. government) knowingly concocted a false account of it (blaming it on the high speed impact of large aircraft and the ensuing fires)
  • that entity used the calamity and the false account to promote and conduct policies (open-ended war and others) that would otherwise be unpalatable

They also shift a major paradigm in the areas of global terrorism and counterterrorism:

• the twin towers’ unexpected, swift and complete disintegration was 9/11’s flagship event, with cameras rolling, 2,000+ civilians inside, shock and awe
• the twin towers' demolition before the completion of their evacuation was definitely the work of terrorists: it was deliberate, it was a surprise, and it killed many civilians who were generally not involved in specific political or military activities
• the demolition of the twin towers is the most formidable terror attack in history: it was morbidly spectacular, it wielded much gratuitous death and destruction, and it generated great fear worldwide
• the individuals who planned and executed the demolition of the twin towers while they were still being evacuated are the most formidable terrorists in history
• the U.S. government gave cover and protection to the most formidable terrorists in history
• the U.S. government’s solemn commitment to fight terror is a grand lie

But the juiciest conclusions, like on Building 7, are epistemological:

• the twin towers' terrorist demolition and its U.S. cover-up are fairly easy to understand, under the guidance of AE911Truth or some similar outfit
• therefore, the numerous leaders and organizations (watchdogs) who ostensibly constantly look for any U.S. faux pas and fight tooth and nail the policies inspired by 9/11 could have dug AE911Truth’s information on their own, drawn AE911Truth’s conclusions, and brought these conclusions to the public’s attention, presumably shortly after 9/11
• had they done so, they could have slain the proverbial dragon and nullified the many 9/11-induced policies that they claim to oppose
• however, virtually none of these watchdogs has done so, perhaps not even those you know or like best
• even in 2011, with the above widely known, the watchdogs still largely ignore—at best—9/11 Truth
• this brings us to 9/11’s fundamental teaching: the enduring, global and cross-disciplinary censorship of the cover and protection the U.S. government granted the most formidable terrorists in history

This leads us to your next 9/11 action items:

• list your sources of information: TV channels, government agencies, religious outfits, political parties, charities, labor unions, advocacy groups, your employer, etc.
  • evaluate whether they should but did not properly report on 9/11
• politely engage those who did not:
  • ask them why they failed to inform you and others of 9/11’s true nature
  • if you’d like, forward them a link to an undisbelievable introduction to 9/11 such as the 9/11 baby step
  • invite them to respond to the accusations that introduction or this page formulates against them
  • consider sending them money at the same time so as to give them an additional incentive to answer you
  • conclude that they could be active participants in the 9/11 censorship
  • accordingly reevaluate your confidence in the information they provide on topics other than 9/11
• look for other sources of information and organizations that have openly opposed policies that 9/11 inspired or favored:
  • evaluate if they could have made their members or followers' work easier by denouncing the cover-up of the twin towers' terrorist demolitions
  • repeat the above exercise on them
  • accordingly consider alerting their members and followers
• look for sources of information and organizations that have lost clout due to 9/11 or the policies 9/11 inspired or favored:
  • wonder if they could have made their members or followers' work easier by denouncing the cover-up of the twin towers' terrorist demolitions
  • repeat the above exercise on them
  • accordingly consider alerting their members and followers
• look for sources of information that have duly reported on the cover and protection the U.S. government granted the most formidable terrorists ever
  • review these alternative sources of information and accordingly give them more credibility
  • rely on these sources if you wish to inform yourself on other aspects of 9/11
• mistrust leaders who claim to be knowledgeable about 9/11 but are uncomfortable with this page

AE911Truth’s analysis of the twin towers’ explosive demolition frames the censorship of Building 7's implosive demolition and of its U.S. cover-up within a still much larger and still much more mysterious context. Far from putting to rest its epistemological plot, it expands it into the baffling question as to how literally tens of thousands of watchdogs of extremely varied types and affinities would somehow conspire worldwide to continuously censor the cover and protection the U.S. government granted the most formidable terrorists in history.

This is precisely 9/11's fundamental teaching:

• the morbidly spectacular controlled demolitions of the twin towers have served as the pretext for many nefarious activities, first among them an open-ended war
• they and their cover-up are evident
• yet no watchdog of importance has voiced concern over this
• his hints at a censorship of gargantuan proportions:
  • it is amazingly resilient
  • it cuts across traditional intra-human boundaries: geographic, religious, economic, political, linguistic, etc.
  • it implicates leaders and organizations whose vested interests or stated missions would have them vociferously denounce the fraud of 9/11
  • it is evil, as it has allowed the 9/11 conspirators to impose a decade of worldwide misery and promises another one

As such, the specifics of 9/11 matter much less than the mind-boggling epistemological questions they raise:

• how has the 9/11 censorship been coordinated?
• how was it designed and built under the nose of “us the people of the world?”
• has it been used to cover other grand conspiracies against "us?"
• has it been used to cover smaller conspiracies also?
• what processes does it use to prevent and fix leaks?
• can “we” gather information about it at all?
• can “we” find its root cause?
• could the discovery of its root cause provide “us” with some benefit, perhaps commensurate with the immense evil the 9/11-induced calamities have inflicted on “us?"
• if so, what would “our” best course of corrective action be?

The discerning reader will concur that it is hard to imagine more pressing questions than these. They turn the 9/11 censorship into an overarching call to relentless investigation. Accordingly, whenever you have completed this page's action items and are comfortable with its conclusions, consider an excursion into an analysis of the 9/11 censorship, its ramifications, and the surprisingly highly favorable paradigm shift they portend.

Love,

Daniel Noël, 2011-July-20