missing WTC7 chart card

"[...] Therefore let us not fear doubt, but let us rejoice in its help [...]"

 —Robert T. Weston

Welcome to the recapitulation of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's demonstration of the technical plausibility of Building 7's demolition.

This recapitulation encompasses the ten previous steps of the demonstration of Building 7's demolition. They used a well-honed version of the scientific method:

For more detailed information, you may want to review AE911Truth's "Blueprint for Truth" DVD, where AE911Truth's founder and CEO Richard Gage, AIA, presents and comments on its slide show.

Our findings so far can be fairly summarized as follows:

AE911Truth's next logical step is to review the assumption that has underlined the official "fire" theory throughout the now-complete demonstration of the demolition's technical plausibility.

Accordingly, whenever you are comfortable with this page's conclusions, consider pursuing AE911Truth's exploration of Building 7's destruction by reviewing the technical plausibility of the idea, implied in the official theory, that office fires ignited by projection of structural steel from the North tower could actually cause catastrophic structural damage to Building 7. Or click on a specific box or phrase in the block-diagram on top of this page to visit some other aspect of it. Or return to its epistemological plot.