missing WTC7 chart card

"[...] Those that would silence doubt are filled with fear; their houses are built on shifting sands [...]"

 —Robert T. Weston

Welcome to the eighth step of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's progressive demonstration of Building 7's demolition.

The demonstration uses a well-honed version of the scientific method:

This exercise in observation and reason is offered by engineering professionals, but people with average mental abilities and a modest education can sustain it. As such, the mass media and the major scientific and technical outfits could have effortlessly published it. Yet they have not.

Kindly note that this page does not prove Building 7's demolition, the impossibility of the official "fire" theory, the fraudulent nature of the latest U.S. technical report on this matter, or the global and persisting censorship thereof. It merely contributes to this proof.

This page concludes the search for and review of the major physical evidence that might have disproved from a technical standpoint the theory of Building 7's controlled demolition. Since this evidence did not disprove this theory, this and the preceding seven pages have established the technical plausibility of Building 7's demolition.

AE911Truth's next chosen step is to look for some specific process that would have been used in the now technically plausible demolition.

Accordingly, whenever you are comfortable with the above conclusions, consider pursuing AE911Truth's exploration of Building 7's destruction by wondering whether it melted steel in large quantities. Or click on a specific box or phrase in the block-diagram on top of this page to visit some other aspect of it. Or return to its epistemological plot.