"[...] It is to the wise as a staff to the blind; doubt is the attendant of truth."
—Robert T. Weston
Welcome to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's exploration of the plausibility of the official theory's underlying assumption that office fires ignited by projection of structural steel from the North tower could conceivably cause catastrophic structural damage to Building 7.
Our findings so far can be fairly summarized as follows:
Now is the time to review the technical assumption, held all along our now-complete demonstration of the demolition's technical plausibility, that office fires ignited by projection of structural steel from the North tower could indeed conceivably cause catastrophic structural damage to Building 7.
You are welcome to explore the segment of AE911Truth's online slide show that discusses this particular question, starting here.
The slides in question happen to yield objective evidence that steel-framed high-rises have consistently resisted fires that have dwarfed Building 7's in scope and duration.
This page concludes the review of the major physical evidence related to Building 7's destruction. It essentially confirms our findings above.
AE911Truth's next logical step is to look for non-physical evidence that corroborates these findings, starting with the last major piece of technical evidence that is left.
Accordingly, whenever you are comfortable with this page's conclusions, consider pursuing AE911Truth's exploration of Building 7's destruction by reviewing the official technical reports that blame it on office fires ignited by projection of structural steel from the North tower. Or click on a specific box or phrase in the block-diagram on top of this page to visit some other aspect of it. Or return to its epistemological plot.